Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Laurie Penny's avatar

I just texted this to a dear friend:

'I’m so fucked off that I have to explain this again. In a typical column you are meant to lay out the basics, to spell out the underlying issue right up top so everyone’s clear. And sometimes that’s so demeaning. I'm just so sick of having to explain over and over again that it is fucking monstrous to force a human being to give birth against their will. That for most of recorded history abortion and contraception were non-controversial. That the laws being put into place in the USA and around the globe are the strictest, most punitive, most misogynist abortion laws the human race has ever known, that overturning roe v Wade would not be a return to ‘normal’- it would be instituting a completely unprecedented degree of reproductive surveillance.

Expand full comment
Laurie Penny's avatar

Here's something I'm trying to work out how to articulate: this is actually bigger and scarier than 'Roe'. The prospect of losing 'Roe' is so overwhelming that I think it's easy to miss a bigger pattern going on around the world - where nations are instituting policies of reproductive coercion. Iran just this week passed laws designed to deprive women of reproductive healthcare, in a move that was specifically about their low birth rates (though not as low as North America's). And two days ago a new report came out describing exactly how coercive policies are proliferating around the world.

Expand full comment
36 more comments...

No posts